Barangaroo Brouhaha

 Written by:
Philip Thalis, Paul Berkemeier and Jane Irwin
 Published in:
Fifth Estate
 Date Published:
14-Sep-2010

LETTER: 14 September 2009 -Philip Thalis, Paul Berkemeier and Jane Irwin were the authors of the competition winning scheme for Barangaroo, a unique waterfront redevelopment site adjoining the Sydney CBD.Following is an edited version of a letter the group sent to the NSW Department of Planning to protest against new proposals that have recently been made for the site by the NSW Government –

We write regarding information that has been posted on the Department’s website in respect of the proposed Modifications to the Barangaroo Concept Plan, with specific reference to the Headland Park.

1.0 Public Exhibition of revised material

We note that parties who made submissions to the Department of Planning regarding the exhibited application, have not been advised that this revised material is available.  Buried within the fine print of these reports are elements that significantly alter the nature of the application. It appears that there is no further public process for review and commentary on this material.

The status of the revised documents is entirely unclear.  The relationship to previously exhibited plans is also unclear.  No future processes regarding approval pathways, implementation, heritage and rchaeological approvals have been set out.

This is an entirely unsatisfactory process for consultation on a project of such critical public importance.

2.0 Revised material

The proponent has submitted eight new documents in response to a number of government and community submissions.

This revised content does little to nothing to address the serious deficiencies in the plan, identified in these submissions.

The new and revised reports suggest that the proponent is at best unwilling and at worst incapable of completing even the most basic concept design process for the proposed Headland Park and instead, is seeking a “blank cheque” approval, with detail and resolution of the plan’s deficiencies to be provided in a manner and timeframe that is entirely at the proponent’s choosing.

continues (click to read Fifth Estate article)